Stay up to date
Keep up to date with our latest news and analysis by subscribing to our regular newsletter
news
January 26 2026
There has been a lot of discussion in recent years about skills shortages in rail. Less attention, however, is paid to something arguably more concerning: skills fade.
Across delivery, the issue is becoming harder to ignore. Funding constraints and delayed investment decisions have created prolonged periods of uncertainty. For many experienced front-line workers, that uncertainty has been the deciding factor in leaving the industry altogether. Once those skills are gone, they are not easily replaced.
Ongoing financial scrutiny at Network Rail, particularly in the early stages of CP7, has had a ripple effect across Tier 1 contractors and the wider supply chain. When work pipelines are unclear or stop-start, the impact on workforce stability is immediate.
Highly skilled, experienced workers cannot afford to sit idle indefinitely. Where their skills are transferable, many have moved into other sectors offering greater certainty and continuity. From a personal and professional perspective, that decision is understandable. From an industry perspective, it presents a long-term risk.
At the same time, the industry has continued to bring through large numbers of entry-level operatives, often via “Blue Hat” programmes. In principle, this is a positive step. We need new people coming into rail.
The challenge arises when expectations and reality do not align. Entry-level workers are frequently sold the prospect of consistent, long-term work, yet many find themselves on zero-hour arrangements with gaps in deployment. Without stability, retention becomes difficult, motivation drops, and those individuals often leave before they fully develop.
The result is an unbalanced workforce:
That is the essence of skills fade. It is not just about numbers; it is about the gradual erosion of capability, confidence and competence on site.
Rail is not an industry where experience can be substituted overnight. Knowledge of possessions, access planning, rules, local infrastructure and safe systems of work is built over years, not weeks.
When experience drains out of the system:
These are not theoretical concerns. They are issues being felt daily on live sites.
The introduction of Great British Railways is often discussed in terms of structure, governance and efficiency. Less is said about what reform will demand from the workforce itself.
If rail is to be reformed for the better, it will require:
Reform presents an opportunity to reset how skills are valued, retained and developed. But that opportunity will only be realised if workforce considerations are treated as a strategic priority, not a secondary consequence of commercial decisions.
Addressing skills fade does not mean slowing down entry-level recruitment. It means balancing it properly.
That balance comes from:
The industry has shown before that it can adapt when it chooses to. The question now is whether skills fade is recognised early enough to prevent lasting damage.
If rail is serious about long-term reform and resilience, protecting experience must be part of that conversation.
.png)
Tom Burrow
Tom is an Account Manager at MSS Infrastructure Ltd. with over 20 years of experience in the rail infrastructure sector, managing frontline labour delivery for the Network Rail Central and West Coast Mainline South Route.
Connect with Tom on LinkedIn here